Wednesday, September 16, 2015

9-17-2015 Update (Debate Results)

CNN's moderation of this "debate" was a joke.  They steered this debate into a GOP bloodbath.  The only winner coming out of this debate is going to be the eventual Democratic nominee thanks to CNN. In any case, after sorting through the CNN created drama >>>>>

Winners:
Carly Fiorina - very articulate, professional and knowledgeable about the issues. Her ability to beat a Democrat in the General Election is also a plus, especially if Hillary is the eventual nominee instead of going to prison.  Her policies are sound and being a woman she would draw in a lot of cross over women from the Democratic Party who realize that extreme leftist policies are bad for the country.

Ben Carson - who doesn't like Ben? Not only is he conservative but he brings a calmness to the stage. Every American knows that Ben would be a true uniter of Americans unlike the Divider in the White House that we have today. His ability to defeat any Democratic nominee is also a big plus.  His positions are solid but he would also draw in racial minorities who were left behind by the current President who values those who come here illegally more than actual poor citizens who are struggling.

Rand Paul - who doesn't like freedom, liberty, and the Constitution?  All the career politicians on the stage, with the exception of Ted Cruz are for big government and support a top down federal approach to national issues rather than leaving them to the local states and cities.  Rand Paul, and his father, have long been a promoter of the Constitution and States Rights.  Rand's liberal approach toward the drug war and his policies on the middle east are controversial to the GOP Establishment.  For this reason Rand Paul is better positioned to defeat the eventual Democratic nominee.  Rand has unequivocally stated that he will defend Israel, maintain a strong military and defend this nation.  The GOP Establishment has painted these policies as "radical" because they still believe in the Cold War, American Intervention, and a top down approach toward solving every problem.  RAND CAN WIN.  HIS FATHER WAS THE ONLY CANDIDATE THAT COULD HAVE DEFEATED OBAMA IN 2012.

Donald Trump - this guy is rude and bombastic. Like Ben Carson, he is not as up to speed on national and world issues.  People either love him or hate him.  He is an attack dog.  If Joe Biden enters the race we will need a guy like Trump who is a true pit bull to get in the ring and fight for us.  I am not a big fan, but if push came to shove and he actually wins the nomination I will be hard pressed to vote my conscience (RAND PAUL) and just might pull the lever for The Donald over any Democrat. The Donald will definitely divide the country in the election but I believe the so called Silent Majority would put him over the top with a victory - and that is all I really care about.  This country cannot survive another term of Democratic rule.

Marco Rubio - I think this guy is really smart.  He has JFK-like good looks and he brings a youthful freshness to the election that we have not seen since 1960.  While I do not like his approach on the middle east, he has a firm grasp of all the issues.  I also do not like the fact that he is firmly in the McConnell camp.  However, he most definitely can deliver latino voters, more so than Jeb.  Marco's good looks, his approach, his intelligence and his youth are all major positives.  He will make the Democratic nominee look like an old fart regardless of whether it is Clinton, Sanders or Biden.  I could live with a Rubio Presidency.  Very likable and I think he would be good for the country if he would cut his ties with the RINO establishment.  HE CAN WIN.

Chris Christie - Did a much better job tonight than last time.  HE CANNOT WIN, so it does not matter that he did a good job.  Another older white guy plus Bridge-Gate.

Ted Cruz - Ted may just be the most intelligent guy on the stage.  He is anti-establishment just like Rand Paul.  However, he has very hawkish opinions on the middle east and that will ultimately scare off the electorate.  He also comes across as stiff and rehearsed during the debate, which further detracts from his other great positions like adhering to the Constitution.  For many reasons, HE CANNOT WIN.  I would like him to stay in the Senate and eventually become the majority leader.

John Kasich - I really like this guy a lot.  However, he did not break out.  He doesn't get enough coverage.  Lastly, HE CANNOT WIN.  He is an old white guy.  Fuggetaboudit.  I may not see another old white guy in the White House in my lifetime.

Scott Walker - Did a great job in Wisconsin.  Demonized by the Democrats and the media for years.  HE CANNOT WIN.

LOSERS:
Mike Huckabee - Nice guy, nice family man. Doesn't have a chance to win.

Jeb Bush - Trump was right - Jeb is low energy, very low.  The Bush name has been dragged through the mud so much in the past 10 years that there is NO WAY HE CAN WIN.  Mike Huckabee has a better chance of winning than Jeb, and Mike's chances are about as close to zero that you can get.




Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Election 2016 Update (Obama and World War III)

BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT (BLUF).  The Communist Party of the United States is alive and well and has amassed quite a few number of Congressional Seats in both our House of Representatives and Senate. Indeed Obama and Clinton are both closet Communists who admire Saul Alinksy and have applied well the Rules for Radicals.  Lastly, I believe we are already seeing a slow boiling start of World War III, which could be the final confrontation between the powers of Freedom, Democracy and Republicanism and the Forces of Communism.  This war, which without a doubt is already underway, will see genocide and death on a scale that will dwarf the numbers of dead and wounded experienced in the last century during World Wars I and II.  

This update is a timely analysis of the so-called Iranian deal, but more importantly I am writing because I believe that the next 14 months or so of Obama's term will be the most dangerous in America's history since our own revolution and civil war.  The next 14 months will be the most dangerous in the history of the world since Germany invaded Poland.  Here's why:

Iran is indeed a rogue terror state, a theocracy based on a warped sense of worldwide religious dominance which will commit genocide in order to advance and expand itself. But let's not be stupid, Iran is also just as much a proxy of Russia as Syria is. China is a new partner of Russia and both countries are encouraged and motivated by weak American leadership to once again believe that they can export and expand communism throughout the world. Indeed, it is well known that Barack Obama is sympathetic to communism, but so too is Hillary Clinton a big fan of Saul Alinsky. There is a huge delegation of Democrats who are also closet members of the CPUSA!
As we can readily see our Senate is infected by communists who are so strong in numbers as to ensure that any legislation threatening the communist movement abroad can be blocked by filibuster. These Democrats are either unwittingly naive or are outright communist sympathizers themselves.
What set the stage for this madness? George W. Bush and his stupid invasion and toppling of Saddam Hussein and the undermining of our own proxy Muslim leaders in Egypt as well as Iraq. Yemen has recently fallen, probably to the delight of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Bush himself ensured the toppling of Saddam, a regime that provided a counter-weight to Iran in the region.
I view the Iranian Deal as meaningless because eventually there will be wider all out war in the middle east. Russia is moving west and has subsumed the Crimea. Ukraine is next. Iran has taken possession of Iraq and is struggling to maintain its foothold in Yemen. Iran controls the terror groups Hamas and Hezzbollah. Iran QUDS forces are active in Syria and are currently launching rockets as I type this into Israel.
Anyone who believes that WW III hasn't already started is fooling themselves. World War III isn't going to kick off like the first world war, or with a similar attack on Pearl Harbor like in WW II. World War III started decades ago and has been slowly boiling to all out war. All out war won't even start with Russia's taking of the Ukraine but that will be a big test of western resolve.
I believe that we will finally realize that we are at war when China moves on Taiwan and North Korea moves on South Korea. At that point America will have to make a choice to either retreat and protect, or to meet the challenge head on and stop it before it becomes a true threat to our homeland. I firmly believe that this attack will occur within Obama's term and more than likely will not begin later than the spring of 2016.  Who hasn't heard that Chinese have operated their Navy aggressively within the 12 mile limit off the coast of Alaska?  Who isn't aware that the Russians and Chinese are operating their Navy ships out of bases in Cuba and Venezuela?  Who hasn't heard that Russian spy ships are once again now trolling off the coast of Georgia near our submarine base in Kings Bay or off the west coast where our fleet is based in Bangor WA?
Make no mistake, the west is scared to death.  The UK, France, Germany and other western nations have see America's weakness and lack of resolve to be a world leader of freedom.  They are capitulating to the desires of Russia.  Scary times indeed!
Obama's threat to Assad, his so-called red line threat of military action if chemical weapons were used held no weight. He caved like a cheap suit. His weakness and lack of response in Syria, Yemen, and indeed Iraq is going to make the next 14 months of his term the most dangerous for the world and to America since our own revolution and civil war.  Saudi Arabia is ramping up its own defenses and other Muslim nations in the middle east are swiftly moving to ramp up its own military, including nuclear weapons capability.  Egypt moved quickly to depose the Muslim Brotherhood else it too would already be in the sphere of Russian and Iranian influence.

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Election 2016 Update 02-SEP-2015 (SAME OLD RNC)

2015-2016 RNC - SAME AS THE 2011-2012 RNC?

The RNC, and the big donors that they represent are shaking in their boots as Americans are turning up their noses at RINOs like Jeb.  Jeb, too embarrassed to even use his own last name in his marketing marquee!

If you donate to the national RNC - STOP.  You should no longer donate to the national or local Republican Party because they only represent special interests.  You should donate directly to the campaign of your candidate only (Ron Paul, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, Ben Carson).  If you desire to continue the mistakes of the past then vote for a RINO. If you want to see the destruction of the country then vote for a Democrat or that Independent self-avowed Socialist Sanders.  However, if you love America, the Republic and the Constitution you should vote for one of the above regardless of who wins the Republican Nomination.  It is my sincere hope that all conservatives will shred their GOP membership if the RNC pulls the same shenanigans that it did in 2012.

Just to refresh those who have forgotten, or to those who did not hear what the National RNC did to Ron Paul in 2012 at the convention.......(as provided by Alexander Snitker and Kristi Brown (Facebook) who was at the convention:

1. The RNC illegally removed duly elected Maine delegates and replaced them with Romney "scab" delegates.
2. Stole delegates from Louisiana, Oklahoma and Massachusetts because they would not vote Romney.
3. Indefinitely detained Ron Paul delegates on buses using armed guards to delay and prevent them from voting on rules in the convention.
4. Indefinitely detained Morton Blackwell on a bus preventing him from filing a minority report opposing new oppressive rule changes designed to marginalize Ron Paul.
5. Drove Virginia rules committee chairmen in circles around the convention center to prevent them from voting on rules thus allowing the RNC to vote in their stead.
6. Refused to acknowledge nomination papers from six states where a five state minimum was required
7. Changed RNC rules on the spot from five state minimum to eight state minimum when they realized Ron Paul would be nominated in order to ensure that Ron would not be able to challenge or oppose Mitt.
8. Denied Ron Paul a floor speech prior to the vote unless he first endorsed Romney.
9. Declared unbound Ron Paul supporters as bound votes for Romney
10. Boehner ignored clear opposition to the rules vote that would prevent a Maine delegation from being seated.
11. Turned off microphones in the Ron Paul delegate section to prevent "division" or "point of order" calls from being heard even after 10 minutes of booing in protest.
12. Seated Ron Paul delegates in the nose bleed section to prevent them from being heard BEHIND territory delegates.
13. Passed rules allowing the RNC committee to choose and approve delegates rather than the states.
14. Refused video equipment in the convention center to allow undocumented cheating.
15. Ron Paul delegates were not allowed to bring signs, but Romney supporters were.
16. Cut off microphones anytime delegates cheered for Ron Paul
17. Called out votes for Romney as Romney votes, but called out Ron Paul as "other".
18. When Ron Paul won the majority of delegates in Iowa ,Nevada and Minnesota, they only called out the few minority votes for Romney.